Skip to Content

Welcome!

Share and discuss the best content and new marketing ideas, build your professional profile and become a better marketer together.

Sign up

The political landscape, particularly the attacks on higher education funding during the Trump era, has underscored the vulnerability of relying solely on traditional public support for university research. To ensure resilience and continued discovery, we need to think creatively about funding.

This space is for discussing and developing alternative funding models for graduate research. We've gathered a diverse set of initial ideas aiming to be both practical and forward-thinking – think research spin-offs, industry consortia, community partnerships, crowdfunding, direct support programs, and more.

We need your collective intelligence to move these from brainstorm to potential reality. Please:

  • Explore the ideas listed in this forum.
  • Vote for those you find most compelling. (at the bottom of each post)

  • Share your insights: What are the strengths, weaknesses, potential pitfalls, or ways to improve each concept?
  • Contribute your own suggestions. (At the bottom of each post using the comments options!)

Let's build a diverse portfolio of funding strategies to empower the next generation of research!

You need to be registered to interact with the community.
This question has been flagged
11 Views

Core Concept

This initiative leverages university research to create engaging public-facing content and experiences, aiming to increase public understanding and support, enhance university visibility, and potentially generate revenue or secure direct funding. It encompasses two complementary approaches:

A) Public Science Experiences: Developing tangible or virtual platforms to showcase research directly to the public. Examples include interactive museum-style installations, guided "research tourism" (e.g., tours of unique labs, facilities, or ecologically significant research sites in NJ), virtual reality (VR) lab simulations, or other hands-on activities. Revenue streams could include admission/participation fees, corporate sponsorships for exhibits, or use as donor cultivation events.

B) Media Partnerships: Collaborating strategically with external media outlets (documentary filmmakers, podcast networks, news organizations, online science platforms) to produce compelling content featuring university research, discoveries, and experts. Funding may be secured directly from the media partner (e.g., for exclusive access, content development, licensing) or generated indirectly through increased public awareness leading to philanthropic support or enhanced reputation.


Implementation Strategy & Key Steps

  • A. Public Science Experiences:
    • Phase 1: Planning & Concept Development: Identify research areas with strong visual appeal, interactive potential, or compelling narratives suitable for public engagement (consider local NJ relevance – e.g., environmental science, pharmaceutical research, local history). Define target audiences (general public, K-12, alumni, potential donors). Conceptualize specific experiences (e.g., "A Walk Through CRISPR Research" VR, "Pinelands Ecology Explorer" installation, specialized lab tour program). Develop detailed budgets, potential revenue models (fees, sponsorship targets), and assess feasibility. Identify lead unit(s) (e.g., university museum, communications office, specific research center, external venue partner like Liberty Science Center). Secure space, technology assessments, and necessary internal approvals. Address safety, accessibility, and liability requirements for public visitors.

    • Phase 2: Development & Launch: Design and fabricate installations, develop VR/digital content, or structure tour programs. Secure venue(s) or platform(s). Develop marketing and promotional materials. Launch the experience, perhaps tied to a university event or public science festival. Implement ticketing, registration, or donation mechanisms if applicable. Recruit and train staff or volunteers (docents, guides) on content and safety protocols.

    • Phase 3: Operation & Evaluation: Manage ongoing operations, staffing, and maintenance. Collect visitor feedback and track attendance/revenue. Evaluate educational impact and visitor satisfaction. Refine the experience based on data. Explore opportunities for traveling exhibits, content licensing, or related workshops to extend reach and impact. Actively seek ongoing sponsorships.

  • B. Media Partnerships:
    • Phase 1: Story Identification & Pitch Development: Proactively identify compelling, newsworthy, or visually engaging research stories and researchers who communicate effectively. Research and target specific media outlets, producers, or journalists whose work aligns with the story's theme and audience. Develop tailored pitches emphasizing the story's significance, uniqueness, visual potential, and available access. Define desired outcomes (visibility, funding potential, narrative focus).

    • Phase 2: Negotiation & Facilitation: Engage with interested media outlets. Negotiate terms of access, potential funding or resource contributions from the outlet, rights to use footage/content, provisions for scientific accuracy review (if possible), and logistical requirements. Formalize partnerships with appropriate agreements reviewed by Legal Counsel and Communications. Facilitate media access to labs, researchers, and facilities smoothly and efficiently according to the agreement.

    • Phase 3: Collaboration & Leveraging: Collaborate with the media team during production as needed, providing information and ensuring accuracy (within agreed boundaries). Once content is released, leverage the media placement through university communication channels (website, social media, alumni magazines) to maximize visibility. Track audience reach and impact on university reputation or subsequent inquiries/support. Cultivate long-term relationships with key media partners.

Key Stakeholders & Roles

  • Internal:
    • Researchers/Labs: Provide the core content, expertise, access for tours/filming; act as subject matter experts or spokespeople.

    • University Communications/PR/Marketing: Lead role, especially for media partnerships. Manages media relations, brand consistency, promotes experiences/placements, may lead content creation efforts.

    • University Museums/Galleries/Libraries: Potential venues, partners, or curators for installations and exhibits.

    • IT/AV/VR Specialists: Provide technical support for digital experiences, installations, and potentially media production needs.

    • Development/Advancement: Leverages positive exposure and engagement events for donor cultivation and fundraising appeals. May secure sponsorships.

    • Legal Counsel: Reviews contracts (media partnerships, venue agreements, sponsorships, waivers), advises on IP rights, liability.

    • Finance Office: Manages budgets, processes revenue (ticket sales, sponsorships, licensing fees), ensures financial compliance.

    • Events Office: May assist with logistics for public events or tours.

    • Relevant Academic Departments/Centers: Support faculty/student participation, may co-host events.

  • External:
    • General Public: Primary audience for experiences and media content.

    • K-12 Students & Educators: Key audience for educational experiences.

    • Museums/Science Centers/Community Venues: Potential partners for hosting installations or events (e.g., venues in Trenton, Princeton, Philadelphia, NYC accessible from Lawrence Township).

    • Media Outlets & Personnel: TV producers, documentary filmmakers, podcast creators, journalists, photographers.

    • Corporate Sponsors: Fund specific exhibits, installations, or public events.

    • Technology Vendors: Providers of VR hardware, exhibit fabrication services, etc.

    • Tourism Agencies: Potential collaborators for promoting unique research-related attractions.

Resource Requirements

  • Personnel: Significant time from Communications/PR staff is essential. Researcher time for participation and expertise. For experiences: potentially requires hiring or contracting exhibit designers, fabricators, VR developers, event staff, docents/guides. Project management skills needed. For media: primarily comms staff time, researcher time, potentially admin support for logistics.

  • Financial:
    • Experiences: Can range from modest (simple lab tour program) to very high (complex interactive installation, VR development). Requires budget for design, development/fabrication, technology, installation, marketing, staffing, maintenance. May require seed funding or grants; potential revenue from fees/sponsorships.

    • Media Partnerships: Lower direct costs (mostly staff time), but potential opportunity cost of researcher time. Potential for direct funding from media partners in some cases (e.g., licensing, access fees, co-production funding).

  • Infrastructure/Technology: Physical space (galleries, labs, public areas) for experiences/tours. Specialized technology (VR headsets, interactive displays, AV equipment). Ticketing/registration software. Website/social media platforms for promotion. Media monitoring services.

  • Policy/Administrative: Policies needed for: public access to campus/facilities, visitor safety and liability, media relations protocols (including spokesperson designation), IP rights related to publicly displayed content or licensed media use, branding guidelines, financial procedures for handling revenue/sponsorships, agreement templates (venue use, media access, sponsorship).

Potential Challenges & Mitigation

  • Cost & Sustainability (Experiences): High upfront/ongoing costs for creating/maintaining engaging experiences; uncertain financial return.
    • Mitigation: Secure grants/sponsorships specifically for outreach exhibits; start with pilots or temporary installations; partner with existing institutions (museums) to share costs/audiences; design for modularity and durability; develop a clear business/sustainability plan.

  • Safety, Liability, Logistics (Experiences): Managing public presence in university spaces, especially labs or sensitive sites.
    • Mitigation: Prioritize safety in design; use designated safe viewing areas or virtual access for restricted zones; implement rigorous safety protocols and training; require waivers; ensure adequate staffing/supervision; maintain appropriate insurance.

  • Ensuring Scientific Accuracy & Engagement: Balancing accuracy with the need to be understandable and engaging for a lay audience; avoiding "dumbing down" or hype.
    • Mitigation: Mandate close collaboration and sign-off between researchers and designers/communicators; utilize evaluation methods (prototyping, audience testing); train interpreters/guides thoroughly; focus on clear storytelling.

  • Maintaining Control over Media Narrative: Risk of inaccurate, sensationalized, or out-of-context media portrayal.
    • Mitigation: Build relationships with reputable journalists/outlets; provide clear background information and fact-checking support; negotiate points of accuracy review in agreements where feasible (often difficult); provide media training to researchers; proactively communicate key messages.

  • Securing Media Funding/Valuing Access: Difficulty convincing media outlets to pay for access or content development support.
    • Mitigation: Highlight uniqueness and exclusivity of access/story; target outlets with budgets for high-quality science content; clearly outline university costs associated with facilitating access; explore licensing specific assets (unique footage, data visualizations) separately.

  • Time Burden on Researchers & Staff: Significant time required for content development, interviews, tours, event participation.
    • Mitigation: Prioritize high-impact opportunities; provide excellent logistical support from Communications/Admin staff; recognize participation in performance reviews; build a pool of trained spokespeople/guides.

Success Metrics & Evaluation

  • Public Engagement Metrics: Number of visitors/participants/viewers/listeners, audience demographics, website traffic related to initiatives, social media engagement, satisfaction surveys (for experiences).

  • Financial Metrics: Revenue generated (tickets, sponsorships, licensing fees), funds raised (if used for cultivation), cost per engagement/visitor, sponsorship ROI (if measurable).

  • Media Impact: Number, reach, and prominence of media placements; message pull-through/accuracy; sentiment analysis; impact on university web traffic or inquiries.

  • Reputation & Awareness: Surveys measuring public awareness/perception (long-term); qualitative feedback from stakeholders; generation of new leads for admissions, development, or partnerships.

  • Evaluation: Track metrics for each initiative. Use audience feedback to improve experiences. Monitor media coverage and its impact. Regularly assess ROI (both financial and reputational) and alignment with university strategic communication and development goals.

University Policy Considerations

  • Media Relations Policy: Procedures for engaging with media, official spokespersons, coordinating interviews/visits.

  • Facilities Use & Public Access Policy: Rules and procedures for allowing public access to campus buildings, labs, or grounds, including safety and security measures.

  • Risk Management & Liability: Insurance requirements, use of waivers for public participants/visitors.

  • Intellectual Property Policy: Guidelines on using university-owned images, data, video, or copyrighted materials in public displays or licensing them to media; ownership of content created through media partnerships.

  • Branding & Communications Policy: Ensuring consistent messaging and visual identity across all public-facing initiatives.

  • Financial Policies: Procedures for handling earned revenue (ticket sales, fees), processing sponsorships or gifts, applying F&A if relevant.

  • Event Management Policy: Guidelines for hosting public events on campus.

  • Ethics Policy: Commitment to accurate and responsible communication of science.

Avatar
Discard