Skip to Content

Welcome!

Share and discuss the best content and new marketing ideas, build your professional profile and become a better marketer together.

Sign up

The political landscape, particularly the attacks on higher education funding during the Trump era, has underscored the vulnerability of relying solely on traditional public support for university research. To ensure resilience and continued discovery, we need to think creatively about funding.

This space is for discussing and developing alternative funding models for graduate research. We've gathered a diverse set of initial ideas aiming to be both practical and forward-thinking – think research spin-offs, industry consortia, community partnerships, crowdfunding, direct support programs, and more.

We need your collective intelligence to move these from brainstorm to potential reality. Please:

  • Explore the ideas listed in this forum.
  • Vote for those you find most compelling. (at the bottom of each post)

  • Share your insights: What are the strengths, weaknesses, potential pitfalls, or ways to improve each concept?
  • Contribute your own suggestions. (At the bottom of each post using the comments options!)

Let's build a diverse portfolio of funding strategies to empower the next generation of research!

You need to be registered to interact with the community.
This question has been flagged
19 Views

Core Concept

This strategy involves the formal establishment of university-sanctioned research centers, institutes, or collaborative "open labs" designed to transcend traditional departmental boundaries. 

These entities bring together faculty, researchers, and students from diverse academic disciplines (e.g., engineering + social science + public health) to focus on complex research problems or "grand challenges" (such as climate change adaptation, AI ethics and society, pandemic preparedness, sustainable urban development – potentially leveraging NJ's specific context like coastal resilience or pharmaceutical innovation). 

The key funding advantage lies in positioning the university to attract significant external funding from sources specifically seeking interdisciplinary, holistic, and innovative approaches, including large federal center grants (e.g., NSF ERCs, NIH P-series), major philanthropic foundations, and potentially consortia of corporate sponsors interested in thematic research areas.


Implementation Strategy & Key Steps

  • Phase 1: Strategic Planning & Proposal:
    • Identify Strategic Niche: Identify complex research themes where the university possesses distinct strengths across multiple departments/colleges and where an interdisciplinary approach offers a competitive advantage for tackling significant scientific or societal problems. Consider alignment with regional needs (NJ/Mid-Atlantic) or national priorities.

    • Develop Vision & Mission: Articulate a clear, compelling vision, mission, and set of research goals for the proposed center/institute. Define the scope and intended impact.

    • Faculty Engagement & Leadership: Identify and secure commitment from a core group of faculty leaders from relevant disciplines, including a potential founding Director with strong scientific vision and leadership skills.

    • Governance & Structure: Propose a governance model (e.g., Director, Executive Committee with representatives from participating units, External Advisory Board) and an operational structure. Outline potential space and resource needs.

    • Financial Planning: Develop a multi-year financial plan identifying potential major funding sources (specific large grants, foundations, potential corporate partners) and outlining needs for initial internal seed funding (often critical for launch).

    • Formal Proposal & Approval: Submit a formal proposal according to university procedures for establishing new centers/institutes, seeking approval from relevant Deans, the Office of Research, and the Provost's Office.

  • Phase 2: Launch & Initial Operations:
    • Establishment & Leadership: Officially establish the center. Appoint the Director and form the initial governance committees.

    • Secure Seed Funding: Obtain initial funding (typically internal strategic funds or an anchor grant/gift) to cover start-up costs, administrative support, and initial pilot research projects designed to foster collaboration.

    • Faculty Affiliation: Formalize processes for faculty from participating departments to become affiliates of the center.

    • Initiate Activities: Launch core activities such as interdisciplinary seminar series, seed grant programs to stimulate joint research, workshops focused on large grant proposal development, and begin building a shared identity and community.

    • Branding & Communication: Develop the center's branding, website, and communication materials highlighting its interdisciplinary nature and mission.

  • Phase 3: Growth & Sustainability:
    • Targeted Fundraising & Grant Writing: Aggressively pursue large-scale external funding opportunities identified in the planning phase. Provide support for developing complex, multi-investigator grant proposals. Cultivate relationships with relevant foundation program officers and corporate partners.

    • Foster Collaboration: Implement mechanisms to actively encourage and support collaboration among affiliates (shared spaces, joint projects, travel grants, data sharing platforms).

    • Manage Resources: Effectively manage shared facilities, equipment, data resources, and administrative functions.

    • Dissemination & Impact: Promote research findings through high-impact publications, conferences, policy briefs, and public outreach. Track and communicate the center's broader impacts.

    • Strategic Adaptation: Regularly review and adapt the center's research focus and strategic direction based on scientific progress, funding opportunities, and feedback from advisory boards.

Key Stakeholders & Roles

  • Internal:
    • Center Director: Provides overall scientific and administrative leadership; chief advocate for the center.

    • Affiliated Faculty: Conduct collaborative research under the center's umbrella; mentor trainees; participate in governance.

    • Center Administrative Staff: (Program Manager, Financial Admin, Comms Specialist) Manage day-to-day operations, finances, grants, events, communications.

    • Students & Postdocs: Conduct research, benefit from interdisciplinary training environment.

    • Steering/Executive Committee: Provides internal governance and strategic oversight.

    • Deans (of involved Colleges): Provide resources, approve faculty participation, ensure alignment with college priorities.

    • Department Chairs: Support faculty participation, coordinate resources.

    • Office of Research: Provides central administrative oversight, assists with large grant submissions and compliance.

    • University Development / Corporate & Foundation Relations: Key partner in identifying and securing external philanthropic and corporate funding.

    • Finance Office: Manages complex budgets with diverse funding streams, ensures financial compliance.

    • Provost's Office: Provides ultimate oversight, approves establishment, often allocates initial strategic funding.

  • External:
    • Major Funding Agencies: (NSF, NIH, DOE, etc.) Source of large center grants.

    • Philanthropic Foundations: Often support interdisciplinary approaches to major societal problems.

    • Corporate Sponsors/Consortia: May fund thematic research relevant to their industry sector.

    • External Advisory Board: Provides external perspective, strategic advice, and connections.

    • Collaborating Institutions/Organizations: Partners in research projects or large grants.

    • Community Stakeholders: If the center's work has direct community relevance or application.

Resource Requirements

  • Personnel: Strong Director. Dedicated center administrative staff (essential for managing complexity). Significant faculty time commitment (especially leadership). Research staff (postdocs, etc.) funded through grants/center funds. Strong support from central administration (Research, Development, Finance).

  • Financial: Requires substantial initial seed funding (internal or anchor external funding) for launch and early operations. Long-term sustainability depends on securing large external grants, major gifts, and/or significant corporate partnerships. Diverse funding portfolio is critical. Budget needs to cover research (seed grants, core facilities), personnel (admin staff, leadership release time), operations, events, and F&A.

  • Infrastructure/Technology: Dedicated or shared physical space (offices, meeting rooms, potentially labs). Access to high-end shared equipment or core facilities relevant to the research theme. Robust IT infrastructure, collaborative software platforms, center website.

  • Policy/Administrative: University policies governing the creation, review, and sunsetting of Centers & Institutes. Clear center-specific governance documents (bylaws). MOUs defining relationships with participating academic units. Advanced grant management capabilities for complex awards. Policies for allocating shared resources and internal funds.

Potential Challenges & Mitigation

  • Funding Volatility & Sustainability: Dependence on large, competitive external grants or long-term philanthropy is inherently risky.
    • Mitigation: Develop a diversified funding plan from inception; prioritize securing multi-year anchor funding; build strong relationships with program officers/foundations; demonstrate consistent high impact; explore endowment building for long-term stability.

  • Breaking Down Silos: Overcoming departmental inertia, fostering genuine cross-disciplinary collaboration, managing credit allocation.
    • Mitigation: Strong, inclusive leadership; clear incentives for collaboration (seed funding, recognition); shared physical spaces/resources promoting interaction; governance structure ensuring broad participation; support from Deans reinforcing interdisciplinary value.

  • Maintaining Strategic Focus: Avoiding mission creep and ensuring research activities remain aligned and impactful.
    • Mitigation: Adherence to a clear strategic plan; regular review and guidance from steering committee and external advisory board; strategic allocation of internal resources (seed grants) to core areas.

  • Faculty Recognition & Workload: Ensuring faculty time spent on center activities is recognized in P&T; managing workload across department and center commitments.
    • Mitigation: University leadership (Provost/Deans) must ensure P&T guidelines explicitly value interdisciplinary work and center leadership; negotiate appropriate faculty release time funded by the center; clearly define roles and expectations.

  • Administrative Complexity: Managing finances from multiple sources, coordinating across units, supporting large grant applications.
    • Mitigation: Invest in experienced, dedicated administrative staff for the center. Utilize robust university financial and grant management systems; establish clear operating procedures; leverage central administrative expertise.

  • Resource Allocation (Space/Equipment): Competition for limited university space and shared high-end equipment.
    • Mitigation: Secure resource commitments during the initial approval phase; develop clear, fair policies for accessing shared resources managed by the center; strong advocacy by leadership for necessary infrastructure.

Success Metrics & Evaluation

  • Funding & Sustainability: Total external grant/gift/contract funding secured by center affiliates for center-related work; diversity of funding sources; success rate in major center grant competitions; progress towards long-term financial stability.

  • Research Productivity & Impact: Quality and quantity of interdisciplinary publications, presentations, patents; evidence of impact on the research field (citations, awards); translation of research into practice or policy.

  • Collaboration & Network: Number of faculty affiliates across departments/colleges; number of joint grant proposals and co-authored publications; documented instances of new collaborations sparked by the center.

  • Training & Education: Number of students/postdocs trained in an interdisciplinary setting; development of related educational programs or curricula.

  • Visibility & Reputation: Recognition of the center as a leader; invitations to national/international forums; positive external reviews.

  • Evaluation: Periodic comprehensive reviews (e.g., every 5-7 years) by internal committees and external peer reviewers, as per university policy. Annual reporting on KPIs to leadership and advisory boards. Assessment against strategic goals and benchmarks.

University Policy Considerations

  • Centers & Institutes Policy: Defines university rules for proposing, establishing, governing, reviewing, and sunsetting these units.

  • Faculty Roles & Responsibilities / Workload Policy: Addresses how affiliations and leadership roles in centers are integrated with departmental duties and effort reporting.

  • Promotion & Tenure Guidelines: Crucial that these explicitly recognize and value interdisciplinary research, collaborative grantsmanship, and leadership within centers.

  • Financial Policies: Governs management of funds from diverse sources, cost allocation, F&A distribution agreements between centers and home departments (often negotiated).

  • Space Allocation Policy: Process for assigning and managing physical space for centers.

  • Intellectual Property Policy: Standard policy applies, but processes might be needed to manage IP from large collaborative projects involving multiple investigators/departments.

  • Cost Sharing Policy: Institutional requirements for matching funds often needed for large grants.

  • Governance Requirements: Mandates for bylaws, advisory boards, reporting structures for centers.

Avatar
Discard