Skip to Content

Welcome!

Share and discuss the best content and new marketing ideas, build your professional profile and become a better marketer together.

Sign up

The political landscape, particularly the attacks on higher education funding during the Trump era, has underscored the vulnerability of relying solely on traditional public support for university research. To ensure resilience and continued discovery, we need to think creatively about funding.

This space is for discussing and developing alternative funding models for graduate research. We've gathered a diverse set of initial ideas aiming to be both practical and forward-thinking – think research spin-offs, industry consortia, community partnerships, crowdfunding, direct support programs, and more.

We need your collective intelligence to move these from brainstorm to potential reality. Please:

  • Explore the ideas listed in this forum.
  • Vote for those you find most compelling. (at the bottom of each post)

  • Share your insights: What are the strengths, weaknesses, potential pitfalls, or ways to improve each concept?
  • Contribute your own suggestions. (At the bottom of each post using the comments options!)

Let's build a diverse portfolio of funding strategies to empower the next generation of research!

You need to be registered to interact with the community.
This question has been flagged
16 Views

Overview

Offer specialized workshops, training programs, virtual research experiences, or simulations based on the group's expertise, charging participation fees. Includes student-led initiatives like paid peer mentorship/tutoring for external clients (e.g., industry execs).


Core Concept

This initiative focuses on creating and delivering non-degree educational programs (e.g., workshops, short courses, professional training, bootcamps, certificate programs, virtual labs/simulations, executive education) leveraging specialized university expertise, research findings, or unique facilities. 

These programs are offered to external audiences (industry professionals, other academics, government employees, potentially the public) for a participation fee. 

The revenue generated covers program costs, instructor compensation, and university overhead, with the net proceeds used to support the originating research groups, departments, or related university initiatives.

 This can encompass programs led by faculty/staff as well as structured, university-approved programs involving graduate students as instructors or mentors for external clients.


Implementation Strategy & Key Steps

  • Phase 1: Planning & Setup:
    • Market Assessment & Niche Identification: Identify areas of unique university expertise (specific technologies, methodologies, analytical skills, research areas) that align with external professional development needs or interests. Research target audiences and competitor offerings.

    • Program Design: Define learning objectives, target audience, format (online, in-person, hybrid), duration, curriculum, and required materials for specific program ideas.

    • Pricing Strategy: Establish fees based on market rates, perceived value, program length/complexity, and full cost recovery (including development time, instruction, administration, materials, marketing, and university F&A).

    • Identify Lead Unit: Determine organizational responsibility – often housed within a central Continuing Education/Professional Studies division, but could be managed by specific colleges, departments, or research centers with appropriate administrative support.

    • Develop Frameworks: Create templates for program proposals, budgets, participant registration/agreements, and instructor contracts/compensation models. Obtain necessary internal approvals.

    • Faculty/Instructor Engagement: Secure buy-in and participation from faculty/experts; develop clear compensation or workload recognition models for their involvement. Define roles for graduate students if applicable (e.g., TAs, specialized tutors).

  • Phase 2: Launch & Operations:
    • Marketing & Outreach: Promote programs through relevant channels (university websites, professional association networks, industry publications, targeted emails, social media).

    • Logistics & Delivery: Manage registration, payment processing, material distribution, technology platforms (LMS, video conferencing, simulation tools), and participant support. Deliver the educational content.

    • Pilot Programs: Launch initial offerings to test the market, refine curriculum, and gather participant feedback.

  • Phase 3: Scaling & Sustainability:
    • Evaluation & Refinement: Use participant feedback and financial results to improve existing programs and inform development of new ones.

    • Portfolio Expansion: Develop sequences of courses, certificate programs, or customized training offerings for corporate clients based on demand.

    • Quality Assurance: Implement processes for maintaining instructional quality and relevance of content across all programs.

    • Streamline Administration: Optimize administrative workflows for efficiency.

Key Stakeholders & Roles

  • Internal:
    • Faculty/Researchers/Subject Matter Experts: Develop curriculum, teach/instruct, provide unique expertise.

    • Graduate Students/Postdocs: Potential instructors, teaching assistants, mentors in specific, approved program structures.

    • Continuing Education/Professional Studies Division: Often provides central infrastructure for marketing, registration, payment, logistics, instructional design support, and program management for non-degree offerings.

    • Department Chairs/Center Directors: Approve faculty participation, potentially manage department-led programs, ensure alignment with departmental mission.

    • IT Services: Support for Learning Management Systems (LMS), online delivery platforms, classroom technology, VR/simulation tools.

    • Finance Office: Manages program budgets, processes payments, oversees revenue distribution according to policy.

    • Legal Counsel: Reviews participant agreements, instructor contracts, liability issues.

    • Marketing/Communications: Assists with promoting programs externally.

  • External:
    • Industry Professionals: Seeking skill enhancement or knowledge updates.

    • Corporate Clients: Seeking customized training for employees.

    • Government Agency Employees: Seeking specialized training.

    • Academics/Students (from other institutions): Seeking specialized methodological or technical training.

    • General Public: For programs on topics of broader interest.

    • Professional Associations: Potential partners for marketing or co-branding.

Resource Requirements

  • Personnel: Significant instructor time (faculty, staff, potentially grad students – requires clear compensation/workload model). Administrative staff for program coordination, marketing, registration, participant support (often centralized in Continuing Ed). Potential need for instructional designers. IT support.

  • Financial: Start-up costs for curriculum development, marketing campaigns, platform fees (LMS, webinar software). Ongoing costs for instructor compensation/fees, materials, administration. Pricing must cover all direct and indirect costs (F&A) and generate net revenue.

  • Infrastructure/Technology: Access to physical classrooms/labs or robust online delivery platforms (LMS, video conferencing). Potential need for specialized software licenses or simulation tools (VR/AR hardware/software). Secure systems for registration and payment processing.

  • Policy/Administrative: Clear university policies governing the approval of non-degree programs, faculty/staff compensation and workload allocation for these activities, appropriate F&A rates, IP rights for course materials, use of university brand, and participant management (registration, fees, cancellations). Student employment policies if students act as paid instructors/mentors.

Potential Challenges & Mitigation

  • Faculty Time & Incentives: Difficulty securing faculty time amidst competing research/teaching demands; lack of clear reward structures.
    • Mitigation: Implement clear university policies defining workload equivalency and/or attractive compensation models (e.g., stipends, revenue-sharing) for instructors; leverage professional staff or appropriately trained graduate students where feasible; ensure strong administrative support to minimize faculty logistical burden.

  • Market Relevance & Competition: Programs may not meet actual market needs or face strong competition.
    • Mitigation: Conduct thorough market research during the planning phase; focus on niches leveraging unique university strengths; pilot programs before large-scale launch; actively solicit feedback for continuous improvement.

  • Maintaining Quality: Ensuring consistent high quality across diverse programs and instructors.
    • Mitigation: Establish clear learning objectives; provide instructional design support and best practices training for instructors; implement robust participant evaluation mechanisms; conduct periodic program reviews.

  • Administrative Complexity: Managing marketing, registration, payments, technology, and participant support effectively.
    • Mitigation: Utilize existing Continuing Education infrastructure where possible; invest in integrated software platforms (LMS, registration systems); standardize processes; ensure adequate administrative staffing.

  • Pricing: Balancing profitability with market competitiveness and accessibility.
    • Mitigation: Benchmark against competitors; clearly communicate the value proposition (e.g., access to leading experts, unique facilities); offer tiered pricing or discounts for volume/partnerships where appropriate.

  • Intellectual Property: Ambiguity regarding ownership and usage rights for course materials developed.
    • Mitigation: Ensure university IP policy or specific agreements clearly address ownership and rights for non-degree course materials; use standard templates and obtain necessary permissions.

Success Metrics & Evaluation

  • Financial Performance: Gross revenue, total costs (direct & indirect), net revenue/profit margin, amount distributed back to departments/research groups.

  • Enrollment & Reach: Number of programs offered, number of participants per program, total unique participants, number of participating organizations/companies.

  • Participant Satisfaction: Feedback scores, testimonials, participant completion rates, repeat enrollment (individuals or organizations).

  • Operational Efficiency: Cost per participant, marketing ROI.

  • Evaluation: Regular (e.g., annual) review by the managing unit, assessing financial viability, participant satisfaction, market relevance, and alignment with university/departmental goals. Use data to make decisions about continuing, modifying, or discontinuing programs.

University Policy Considerations

  • Approval Process for Non-Degree Programs: Formal mechanism for proposing, reviewing, and authorizing new offerings.

  • Faculty/Staff Workload & Compensation: Policies defining how this work counts towards official duties and how instructors are compensated.

  • Student Involvement/Employment: If students are paid instructors/mentors, relevant employment policies apply.

  • Use of University Name, Logo, and Branding: Guidelines for marketing materials.

  • Use of University Facilities & Resources: Policies and potential fees for using classrooms, labs, IT infrastructure.

  • F&A (Indirect Cost) Rates: Specific rates applicable to revenue-generating educational activities (often differs from research rates).

  • Intellectual Property Policy: Must address ownership and rights related to curriculum and course materials developed for non-degree programs.

  • Financial Policies: Procedures for fee setting, revenue collection, payment processing, refunds, and distribution of net revenue.

  • Participant Management Policies: Registration procedures, cancellation/refund rules, codes of conduct, data privacy related to participants.

Avatar
Discard
Related Posts Replies Views Activity
0
May 25
12
0
May 25
16
0
May 25
12
0
May 25
19